#Hackrf vs wifispy driver
#Hackrf vs wifispy software
#Hackrf vs wifispy free

Overloading - Overloading occurs when a signal is too strong and saturates the ADC, leaving no space for weak signals to be measured. The higher the bit size of the ADC the more accurate it can be when sampling. It samples an analogue signal and turns it into digital bits. Sensitivity - More sensitive radios will be able to hear weaker stations easier, and produce high SNR values.ĪDC - Analogue to digital converter.

#Hackrf vs wifispy free

The alias free bandwidth is the actual usable bandwidth and is usually smaller than the advertised bandwidth. The downside is that greater CPU power is needed for higher bandwidths.Īlias Free Bandwidth - The bandwidth on SDR displays tends to roll off at the edges, and also display aliased or images of other signals.

#Hackrf vs wifispy software

This is the peak signal strength minus the noise floor strength.īandwidth - A larger bandwidth means more signals on the screen at once, and more software decimation (better SNR). SNR - When receiving a signal the main metric we want to measure is the 'Signal to Noise' (SNR) ratio. So first we will review some terminology, features and specifications that are required for a good RX SDR. In this review we will only consider RX performance. If you don't want to read all of this very long post then just scroll down to the conclusions at the end. In this post we will review the Airspy, review the SDRplay RSP and review the HackRF and compare them against each other on various tests. These three are all in the price range of $150 to $300 USD. When people consider upgrading from the RTL-SDR, there are three mid priced software defined radios that come to most peoples minds: The Airspy ( store), the SDRplay RSP ( store) and the HackRF ( store). However, our preference is the Airspy HF+ Discovery for HF signals, and the SDRplay RSP1A for generic wideband wide frequency range receiving. Overall it is now difficult to pick a winner between Airspy and SDRplay products. IMPORTANT NOTE: Please note that this review is now out of date as the SDRplay RSP line has received significant improvements to their hardware and Airspy have brought out a new SDR that is much better at HF. ExtIO with Decimation & Tuner Bandwidth ControlsįebruReview: Airspy vs.

#Hackrf vs wifispy driver

Manual gain controls and decimation driver.

Measuring Traffic Volumes with Passive Radar.

SignalsEverywhere Direction Finding Tutorial.

Measuring Filter Characteristics & VSWR.

Performing Replay Attacks with RTL-SDR and RpiTX.

QRP (FT8, JT9, WSPR etc) Monitoring Station.

Decoding 433 MHz ISM Band Weather Stations.

GOES 16/17 and GK-2A Weather Satellite Tutorial.

So, getting started can be really simple, even for the very beginners.

Everything related to this device, such as documentation, projects, examples, blogs is available all over the Internet.

You can use it capture data from any ASK/OOK/MSK/2-FSK/GFSK modulation in the 300 – 928 MHz band, then analyze and re-transmit (reverse engineer signal) the modified digital signal.

It’s super easy to incorporate with your own projects, thanks to RFCat firmware, which is nothing else than another program in Linux written in Python.

This pseudo SDR device is very useful when it comes to reverse engineering and digital signal analyzing.

It can be used for hacking garage door remote controllers, jamming wireless home alarms in a few seconds, reverse engineering wireless cabinet locks, etc.

You can also use it in combination with RTL-SDR device for jamming and replay attacks (keyless entry attacks). YARD Stick One role in this combination will be the transmission of the unlock code.

If you were playing with RF devices in the past, combining Yardstick One dongle, a Proxmark RFID and a Raspberry Pi will give you a very powerful toolset for keyfobs cloning.You’ll be capable of sniffing RF data only using Yard Stick One and an interactive Python shell.Here are some reasons why you should try YARD Stick One: Well, it doesn’t need to be if we give the chance to this small pseudo-sdr device. We all know that equipment for this type of pentesting can be expensive. SDR devices are very powerful and highly used by all people interested in RF hacking, pentesting and cyber security researching.